Now there was a man in Maon whose business was in Carmel; and the man was very rich, and he had three thousand sheep and a thousand goats. And it came about while he was shearing his sheep in Carmel (now the man’s name was Nabal, and his wife’s name was Abigail. And the woman was intelligent and beautiful in appearance, but the man was harsh and evil in his dealings, and he was a Calebite), (1Sa 25:2-3)
When Abigail saw David, she hurried and dismounted from her donkey, and fell on her face before David and bowed herself to the ground. She fell at his feet and said, “On me alone, my lord, be the blame. And please let your maidservant speak to you, and listen to the words of your maidservant. “Please do not let my lord pay attention to this worthless man, Nabal, for as his name is, so is he. Nabal is his name and folly is with him; but I your maidservant did not see the young men of my lord whom you sent. “Now therefore, my lord, as the LORD lives, and as your soul lives, since the LORD has restrained you from shedding blood, and from avenging yourself by your own hand, now then let your enemies and those who seek evil against my lord, be as Nabal. (1Sa 25:23-26)
Abigail was married to a RASN (reviler, abuser, sociopath, narcissist). Nabal the fool (as Abigail emphasized, ‘for as his name is, so is he.’), had put his entire household in mortal danger. David and his men were coming to wipe them out as a result of Nabal’s wickedness. So what did Abigail do?
She took action to protect herself and the entire household. She exercised self-defense. She was married to an abuser and she was an abused wife. She defended herself. And the Lord blessed her.
Surely we can see in this account that God permits abused women to defend themselves. To take action. Such actions can include many things – making economic provision for escape, separation, divorce, and so on. She has a right to ask for help. She has a right to expose her RASN’s evil foolishness and tactics. All of these things are simply forms of self-defense.
Those people who (some pastors, many Christians, theologians, counselors)…who deny the abuse victim’s God-given rights to self-defense need to be called to accounts for the ridiculous ends to which such denials lead. If an abuser is poisoning his target, if he picks up a gun or a knife and is threatening to kill her, consistency requires these people to insist that the victim must submit, even if it kills her. Some Christian leaders have actually come out and said this, claiming that the “suffering” will sanctify her and if she dies, well, all the abuser has done is send her to glory. The Apostle Paul had the right to appeal to Caesar, but abuse victims do not?