But when the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, “Look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath.” He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence, which it was not lawful for him to eat nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests? Or have you not read in the Law how on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are guiltless? I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. And if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath.”
(Matthew 12:2-8)
In my early years as a pastor, I benefitted greatly from the preaching, teaching, and writing ministry of John MacArthur, Jr. I remember using his book “The Gospel According to Jesus” as a text in a Sunday morning class and we all profited from his rejection of the idea that a person can be a Christian and yet never confess Jesus as Lord (ie, obey Jesus). Because, that false teaching maintained, we are saved by grace and to require obedience to Jesus as Lord would be to add works to the gospel. MacArthur used God’s Word to shut down what really was a heresy.
We know that MacArthur produced a tremendous number of books and articles. He preached and taught at Grace Community Church for decades, edited the MacArthur Study Bible, founded the Master’s Seminary, taught on a longstanding radio broadcast, and more.
And yet…what are we to think? I ask this question because there have been very troubling cases of MacArthur and his elders and staff doing great harm to victims of domestic violence. The case of Eileen Gray and her abuser husband is a classic example. Eileen was publicly ex-communicated by MacArthur and the church provided comfort to her (at the time) husband, David Gray. David would ultimately be convicted of aggravated child molestation and other charges of abusing their children, a conviction for which he received a sentence of 21 plus years in prison. But even then Grace Community Church continued to support him, even helping him start a Bible study ministry to fellow prisoners.
So…what are we to think? How can a pastor preach and teach God’s Word and accomplish such apparently great things for Christ…and yet mistreat and even endanger an abuse victim and her children? Let me suggest one explanation.
John MacArthur fervently stood for the inerrancy and authority of the Bible. He used a “hermeneutic” (ie, a method of Bible interpretation) that was what I call “wooden literalism.” Now, I believe and teach that the Bible is indeed the inerrant and authoritative Word of God, and that we are to interpret it for exactly what it says and means. But I recognize that the Bible often uses symbols and types and figures to convey those literal truths which they represent. Much of the book of Revelation, for instance, uses such symbols and those who insist that the multiheaded beast is literally a multiheaded beast, or that the armies of locusts are actual hordes of locusts, well…such people are going to come to wrong and ridiculous conclusions. However, those symbols represent a literal thing or place or persons. To recognize the use of symbols and figures is certainly not a denial of the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible.
But what has this to do with John MacArthur? Simply this – his approach to the Bible was so unbending and stiff that it led him to wrong conclusions in numbers of cases, and specifically in respect to the Bible’s teaching about marriage and divorce. For MacArthur, when he read this:
But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery. (Matthew 5:32)
…he concluded and taught that Jesus meant to establish an absolute, universal principle which applies in all cases. “Divorce for any reason but adultery and it is sin.” Boom! There it is! [If you have read David Instone-Brewer’s book “Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible,” you will understand that there are valid reasons to conclude that Jesus was dealing specifically with a particular type case which His opponents connivingly asked Him about].
But back to MacArthur’s wooden literalism. If you simply look at the cases which he and his church leadership have handled, such as that of Eileen Gray’s, you will see that his hermeneutic led MacArthur to ridiculous, damaging, and illogical applications. No divorce ever except for adultery. No separation ever for domestic abuse. If a husband commits literal adultery with another woman, ok, the wife can divorce him. But if he has sex with one of the children….she must stay in the marriage, suffer for Jesus, and be a saintly model to the kids. See it? This is just like the Pharisees and their “letter of the law” approach to Scripture which Jesus condemned. They would refuse to support their own parents who were in need and instead give a tithe to the Temple. Jesus told them – listen to this very carefully –
‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless.
It is my conclusion therefore that John MacArthur, for all of his accomplishments, failed at one of the most important points in standing for Christ. He applied the Bible in a merciless manner in cases like that of Eileen Gray and her children. Why? Only the Lord really knows, but could it be that MacArthur was soooo zealous to stand for the Bible as the Word of God and to oppose the heresies of liberal theology and the false gospel or Rome, that his zeal carried him into the realm of error and merciless handling of cases where mercy was required?
There are lessons here for all of us. Every Christian must be zealous for the Lord, but we must be sure that our zeal is really for God and His truth and not something concocted by our own ideas. Paul saw this error in his own countrymen:
For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. (Romans 10:2)
We must also recognize that we go wrong if we make too much of any man and begin to regard him as infallible. Those are dangers lurking for all who look at the ministry accomplishments of MacArthur. We can be thankful for the good, but always aware that our trust must be in the Lord alone and never come to a point of accepting something simply because a famed man said it.
We should pray that the pastoral staff of Grace Community Church and the Master’s Seminary faculty all have their eyes opened by the Lord and turn away from their serious errors of denying mercy to those in need of it.